新北巿人,在台北做4次試管嬰兒都失敗,來博元婦產科一次試管嬰兒+子宮內膜刺激術,就懷孕,她高興哭了~喜極而泣！!

2012.10.23



 

又一個做 試管嬰兒子宮內膜刺激術 懷孕了！ 博元婦產科最近幾乎每個做 試管嬰兒子宮內膜刺激術 每個 懷孕了, 都太好了！ 又一個做 試管嬰兒子宮內膜刺激術 懷孕了！ http://www.flickr.com/photos/41541241@N08/7770611584/in/photostream http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=10151090640128363&saved 新北巿人,在台北做4次試管嬰兒都失敗,來博元婦產科一次試管嬰兒就懷孕,她高興哭了~喜極而泣！!新北巿人,在台北做4次試管嬰兒都失敗,來博元婦產科一次試管嬰兒就懷孕,她高興哭了~喜極而泣！!
新北巿人,在台北做4次試管嬰兒都失敗,來博元婦產科一次試管嬰兒+子宮內膜刺激術,就懷孕,她高興哭了~喜極而泣！!又一個做 試管嬰兒子宮內膜刺激術 懷孕了！
博元婦產科最近幾乎每個做 試管嬰兒子宮內膜刺激術 每個 懷孕了, 都太好了！ 又一個做 試管嬰兒子宮內膜刺激術 懷孕了！

 

博元婦產科最近幾乎每個做 試管嬰兒子宮內膜刺激術 每個 懷孕了, 都太好了！ 又一個做 試管嬰兒子宮內膜刺激術 懷孕了！
又一個做 試管嬰兒子宮內膜刺激術 懷孕了！博元婦產科最近幾乎每個做 試管嬰兒子宮內膜刺激術 每個 懷孕了, 都太好了！

子宮內膜刺激術，試管嬰兒懷孕率高達百分之一百的秘密武器！
 

子宮內膜刺激術，試管嬰兒懷孕率高達百分之一百的秘密武器！

子宮內膜刺激術，試管嬰兒懷孕率高達百分之一百，真的還是假的？子宮內膜刺激術，試管嬰兒懷孕率高達百分之一百，真的還是假的？
 

(期刊是在2011年10月份生殖生物及內分泌醫學期刊)
EM子宮內膜刺激術根據國外一份研究，懷孕率高達百分之一百，真的還是假的？
這是2012年的國際醫學期刊，30個多次屢次試管嬰兒失敗的病人，6個有做子宮內膜刺激術(怎麼做？如您影片中看到的)，24個沒有做中只有11人懷孕(46％)，有做的6個全部懷孕，作者在論文當中提到懷孕率百分之一百(100％)，這是我看過的醫學文獻，最勇敢的一篇國際權威論文。
Results

Patients received endometrial biopsy protocol achieved a pregnancy rate of 100%. By contrast, only 46% of patients with similar clinical characteristics (N = 24) achieved pregnancy without the hysteroscopic biopsy-induced endometrium injury (p < 0.05).

Abstract
Background

To test whether a site-specific hysteroscopic biopsy-induced injury in the endometrium during the controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycle improves subsequent embryo implantation in patients with repeated implantation failure, a total of 30 patients who have had good responses to controlled ovulation stimulation but have failed to achieve pregnancy after two or more transfers of good-quality embryos were recruited in this prospective study.
Methods

A single, site-specific hysteroscopic biopsy-induced injury was generated on the posterior endometrium at midline 10-15 mm from the fundus during the D4-D7 period of the ongoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycle in six patients.
Results

Patients received endometrial biopsy protocol achieved a pregnancy rate of 100%. By contrast, only 46% of patients with similar clinical characteristics (N = 24) achieved pregnancy without the hysteroscopic biopsy-induced endometrium injury (p < 0.05).
Conclusions

Our proof-of-concept study demonstrates that a site-specific hysteroscopic endometrium injury performed during the ongoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle, instead of injuries received during