子宮內膜刺激術,試管嬰兒懷孕率高達百分之一百的秘密武器! 子宮內膜刺激術,試管嬰兒懷孕率高達百分之一百,真的還是假的? 子宮內膜刺激術,"剌激"那裡?

2013.07.01

子宮內膜刺激術,試管嬰兒懷孕率高達百分之一百的秘密武器! 子宮內膜刺激術,試管嬰兒懷孕率高達百分之一百,真的還是假的? 子宮內膜刺激術,"剌激"那裡? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpDNuWkUtlY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LO11XyoQS0E 子宮內膜刺激術,試管嬰兒懷孕率高達百分之一百的秘密武器! 子宮內膜刺激術,試管嬰兒懷孕率高達百分之一百,真的還是假的? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhodTTgORto http://www.flickr.com/photos/41541241@N08/7649010462/sizes/c/in/photostream/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/41541241@N08/7676012320/in/photostream http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqaN9k2loZw em sti 照片 3 (4) 內膜刺激2 照片 4 (10) http://www.flickr.com/photos/41541241@N08/7649010462/sizes/c/in/photostream/ 照片 2 (11) 照片 1 (7) 子宮內膜刺激術,試管嬰兒懷孕率高達百分之一百,真的還是假的? (期刊是在2011年10月份生殖生物及內分泌醫學期刊) EM子宮內膜刺激術根據國外一份研究,懷孕率高達百分之一百,真的還是假的? 這是2012年的國際醫學期刊,30個多次屢次試管嬰兒失敗的病人,6個有做子宮內膜刺激術(怎麼做?如您影片中看到的),24個沒有做中只有11人懷孕(46%),有做的6個全部懷孕,作者在論文當中提到懷孕率百分之一百(100%),這是我看過的醫學文獻,最勇敢的一篇國際權威論文。 Results Patients received endometrial biopsy protocol achieved a pregnancy rate of 100%. By contrast, only 46% of patients with similar clinical characteristics (N = 24) achieved pregnancy without the hyster oscopic biopsy-induced endometrium injury (p < 0.05). Abstract Background To test whether a site-specific hysteroscopic biopsy-induced injury in the endometrium during the controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycle improves subsequent embryo implantation in patients with repeated implantation failure, a total of 30 patients who have had good responses to controlled ovulation stimulation but have failed to achieve pregnancy after two or more transfers of good-quality embryos were recruited in this prospective study. Methods A single, site-specific hysteroscopic biopsy-induced injury was generated on the posterior endometrium at midline 10-15 mm from the fundus during the D4-D7 period of the ongoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycle in six patients. Results Patients received endometrial biopsy protocol achieved a pregnancy rate of 100%. By contrast, only 46% of patients with similar clinical characteristics (N = 24) achieved pregnancy without the hysteroscopic biopsy-induced endometrium injury (p < 0.05). Conclusions Our proof-of-concept study demonstrates that a site-specific hysteroscopic endometrium injury performed during the ongoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle, instead of injuries received during